Abstract

The topic of "Artificial Intelligence" has become increasingly common, bringing with it various questions and details. The integration of generative AI into applications has created a new way of perceiving the world and attracted new audiences to the realm of technology. In courts, AI is already being used extensively to assist staff in managing cases and updating rulings. There are even AI systems aiding judges in decision-making, utilizing the judge's token if they so choose. From this arises the question: "Could an autonomous software identify itself on behalf of a human being?" If so, what would the consequences of such an action be? For these and other reasons, there is an urgent need to identify works generated by AI and assign proper authorship to its creations, so that their actions can be easily traced and held accountable. In this context, digital signatures emerge as a method that has proven to be effective and secure in validating remotely executed actions, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, digital signatures could easily be used by AI itself through its own encryption, applied at the time of the creation of the work or the conclusion of the legal act, facilitating its identification and ensuring the legality of its processes in the legal world. However, it is not enough to simply be aware of the existence of AI; it is necessary to understand its operation for it to be a useful tool for the judiciary, through intelligent management.

Keywords

• Artificial intelligence, Digital signature, Identify.

License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.